- Special Sections
- Time Out
By PAUL J. SPETRINI
EXETERâThe Exeter Town Council hopes voters have had a change of heart since 2010 as Monday night, during its regular monthly meeting, the council approved a measure to once again ask residents to add a new position in the notoriously small municipal government.
In a 3-1 vote, with member Dan Patterson dissenting, the council agreed to move forward with a ballot question in this Novemberâs election seeking approval to create a town administrator position that will employ someone to handle the âday-to-day operationsâ of Exeter.
Council President Arlene Hicks, who currently operates as an unofficial liaison between members of the public and the council whenever she can, said Monday that the town is at a disadvantage by not having a dedicated person in place that can make decisions, answer questions or field inquiries on behalf of the municipality.
Citing examples where state officials have needed paperwork filled out âthat dayâ or local residents have had a request of the council only to be told âwe meet in three weeksâ, Hicks said Exeter misses out on a lot by not having a person of authority in charge who can make decisions.
Itâs an argument member Cal Ellis has made to voters for years.
âThis issue has been on the ballot many times,â Ellis said. âAfter defeating a year and a half ago, my thought we give it a rest but the fact is when something needs to be done, it needs to be addressed over and over again.â
In voting against the measure, Patterson said he was concerned about the politics of the position. With a council that is up for reelection every two years, he argued, whatâs to stop the position from constantly turning over?
âIf we appoint an administrator, every time we have new council, heâd get fired,â Patterson said. âMy thought is why not have a mayor? We can have them voted on every two years. With this council, youâd be spending six months doing a search every couple of terms.â
Hicks offered a suggestion of having the proposed town administrator sign a contract and operate much the way the school committee, which itself is constantly up for election, interacts with a superintendent.
Following the approval of the ballot question, the council voted 4-0 to hold a public hearing, as required by law, at its next meeting in September.
The council also introduced a pair of ordinance changes during Mondayâs meeting that would help shape the future of a planned village overlay district and would amend the townâs comprehensive plan. For more on these changes and what they mean for local residents, pick up a copy of next weekâs Standard-Times.