- Special Sections
- Time Out
- Local Guide
CHARLESTOWN â Despite the fact that the Whalerock case was settled Thursday with the townâs purchase of the property on Kingâs Factory Road, a Superior Court judge filed a ruling Friday stating that the town of Charlestown is an aggrieved party in the case.
In April, Washington County Superior Court Judge Kristin E. Rodgers issued a lengthy decision relating to the Whalerock proceedings ultimately remanding the case back to the Charlestown Zoning Board for a decision on Whalerockâs application to erect two wind turbines in the town, and ruling that the town did not have standing in the case because it was not an âaggrieved party.â
The town filed a motion May 22 for the court to reconsider its decision that the town was not an aggrieved party, which is defined as âany person or persons or entity or entities who can demonstrate that their property will be injured by a decision of any officer or agency responsible for administering the zoning ordinance of a city or town; or anyone requiring notice pursuant to this chapter.â
Based on the above definition and evidence presented by attorneys for the town and for Whalerock, Rodgers previously ruled that the town was not an aggrieved party.
âIt is undisputed that the town does not own property abutting â or even in the vicinity of â the parcel that is the subject of Whalerockâs application,â Rodgers wrote in her April ruling. âLikewise, it is undisputed that the town is not a party to whom notice must be given under the provisions of the Zoning Enabling Act âŠ It is clear beyond a reasonable doubt that the town lacks standing to appeal the zoning boardâs decision and, therefore, would not be entitled to relief under any set of facts.â
After the ruling, it came to light that the town did in fact own property within a 200-foot radius of Whalerockâs parcel.
For the whole story, pick up today's Chariho Times.